Indoxyl Sulfate Synthesis Essay

Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is now clearly recognized as a public health problem worldwide. Patients with CKD display a substantial increase in end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD).1 Moreover, the prognosis of CVD in CKD is extremely poor.2 Understanding the pathophysiology of CVD in CKD might help to develop treatment strategies to reduce its morbidity and mortality. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors for the general population, such as diabetes mellitus, high blood pressure, and dyslipidemia, are more common in patients with CKD, but cannot entirely explain the increased cardiovascular risk.3 Compelling evidence suggests that the uremic milieu itself plays a critical role in the development and progression of CVD.4 Various solutes that would normally be excreted by the kidneys accumulate in patients with CKD. These solutes are called uremic toxins when they interact negatively with biological functions and contribute to the uremic syndrome. Of note, the gut microbiota is markedly altered in CKD. Fermentation of protein and amino acids by certain gut microbiota results in the generation of different toxic metabolites that are absorbed into the circulation and are retained in CKD. Indoxyl sulfate, indole‐3 acetic acid, p‐cresyl sulfate, trimethylamine N‐oxide, and phenylacetylglutamine are uremic toxins derived from dietary protein metabolism by gut microbiota (Table 1) that have been associated with CVD in patients with CKD (Table 2).5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 Indoxyl sulfate is among the most representative gut‐derived uremic toxins and has emerged as an important therapeutic target. In this review, we will summarize recent advances in understanding the association between gut‐derived uremic toxins and CVD in CKD, with special emphasis on the pathogenic role of indoxyl sulfate.

Table 1.Gut‐Derived Uremic Toxins That Have Been Associated With CVD in Patients With CKD
Table 2.Summary of Studies Relating Gut‐Derived Uremic Toxins to CVD in Patients With CKD

Gut‐Derived Uremic Toxins in CKD

Uremic toxins are traditionally classified, according to the physicochemical characteristics affecting their clearance during dialysis, into the small water‐soluble molecules (molecular weight [MW] <500 Da), the larger “middle molecules” (MW >500 Da), and the protein‐bound molecules.19 Alternatively, uremic toxins may be classified according to their site of origin. Although endogenous metabolism is the prime contributor to the internal milieu, a significant fraction of uremic retention solutes originates from the intestinal tract. Aronov et al demonstrated, by using high‐resolution mass spectrometry, an absence or reduced plasma levels of >30 uremic solutes in hemodialysis patients with a colectomy compared to those with an intact colon.20 Indeed, loss of renal function is not the sole reason for high serum concentrations of these uremic retention solutes. There is increasing interest in the gut microbiota as a relevant source of uremic toxins, because CKD profoundly alters the gut microenvironment and has been associated with a distinct gut microbial composition and metabolism. Poesen et al studied fecal metabolite profiles of hemodialysis and healthy individuals and observed a clear discrimination with 81 fecal volatile organic compounds detected at significantly different levels in the 2 groups.21 Vaziri et al further showed a marked difference in the abundance of 190 microbial operational taxonomic units between hemodialysis patients and healthy controls,22 with significant expansion of bacterial families possessing urease, uricase, and indole and p‐cresol forming enzymes in hemodialysis patients.23 Indole is produced by intestinal bacteria as a degradation product of the amino acid, tryptophan, and is subsequently absorbed and metabolized in the liver to indoxyl sulfate, the prototype of protein‐bound uremic toxins. Increased intestinal concentration of uremic toxins associated with CKD leads to disruption of intestinal barrier integrity and translocation of bacterial components and metabolites, which triggers intestinal and subsequent systemic inflammation and could further accelerate the progression of CKD.24

Clinical Studies of Cardiovascular Toxicity of Indoxyl Sulfate in CKD

Indoxyl sulfate accumulates in CKD, circulating mostly bound to albumin, and cannot be sufficiently removed by means of conventional dialysis. In addition to involvement in the progression of CKD,25 a growing number of clinical studies supports the idea that indoxyl sulfate may also contribute to CVD in the CKD and ESRD population. Barreto et al had previously demonstrated that serum levels of indoxyl sulfate were positively and significantly associated with aortic calcification and pulse wave velocity (PWV) in patients with different stages of CKD.5 Moreover, the highest indoxyl sulfate tertile was a powerful predictor of overall and cardiovascular mortality. Additionally, Lin et al determined that serum indoxyl sulfate level was a valuable marker in predicting cardiovascular events in patients with advanced CKD.6 Recently, Cao et al conducted a prospective study to investigate the relationship between indoxyl sulfate and heart failure in patients with ESRD on hemodialysis. After a median follow‐up of 48 months, high plasma indoxyl sulfate was associated with a higher risk of first heart failure event. The results remained significant after adjusting for both conventional and unconventional risk factors.7 In our recent study,8 hemodialysis patients undergoing angioplasty for access dysfunction were prospectively enrolled over a 3‐year period, with 175 and 131 of the enrolled patients having arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) and arteriovenous fistulas, respectively. After a median follow‐up of 32 months, 86% of patients had symptomatic restenosis, 50% had access thrombosis, and 8% had access failure. Patients with AVG thrombosis after endovascular interventions had higher serum levels of free and total indoxyl sulfate. Moreover, absolute and tertiles of free indoxyl sulfate levels independently predicted AVG thrombosis. Therefore, indoxyl sulfate may be involved in the development and progression of CVD in patients with CKD.

Basic Studies of Cardiovascular Toxicity of Indoxyl Sulfate in CKD

By virtue of its proinflammatory and pro‐oxidant properties,4 indoxyl sulfate is implicated in the pathogenesis of at least 6 phenotypes of CVD in CKD (Figure 1), including atherosclerosis,26, 27, 28, 29 arteriosclerosis,30, 31, 32, 33 congestive heart failure,34, 35, 36 arrhythmia,37, 38, 39 vascular access thrombosis,40, 41 and peripheral arterial disease (PAD).42, 43

Figure 1.

Role of indoxyl sulfate in the pathogenesis of various forms of cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease. EPC indicates endothelial progenitor cell; VSMC, vascular smooth muscle cell.

Atherosclerosis

It had been recognized early after the introduction of maintenance hemodialysis that atherosclerosis was the major cause of CVD in patients with CKD and that its progression, based on observations of long‐term survivors on hemodialysis, was accelerated by the uremic state.44 Endothelial dysfunction is considered an early marker for atherosclerosis. Oxidative stress and nitric oxide (NO) deficiency play an important role in endothelial dysfunction observed in CKD. Tumur et al have shown in vitro that indoxyl sulfate inhibits NO production and cell viability by inducing free radicals through induction of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase in human vascular endothelial cells (HUVECs).26 Furthermore, Dou et al demonstrated that indoxyl sulfate inhibits the proliferation and wound repair of HUVECs.27 Finally, several reports have described that indoxyl sulfate upregulates endothelial expression of adhesion molecules and enhances leukocyte endothelial interactions in vitro and in vivo.28, 29 These findings suggest that indoxyl sulfate may be responsible, at least in part, for atherosclerosis in CKD by inducing inflammation and endothelial dysfunction.

Arteriosclerosis

Although atherosclerosis clearly contributes to the high prevalence of CVD morbidity and mortality in patients with CKD, it is often accompanied by the involvement of nonatherosclerotic processes such as arteriosclerosis, which has the principal consequences of left ventricular hypertrophy and altered coronary perfusion.45 Aging is associated with degeneration and sclerosis of the medial layer of large arteries. Arteriosclerosis in CKD is mainly characterized by premature arterial aging with diffuse thickening and stiffening of arterial walls. Arteriosclerosis, as determined by aortic PWV, is a strong independent predictor of all‐cause, and mainly cardiovascular, mortality in patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis.46

Vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) is the sole cell type of the medial layer of the vascular wall. VSMC proliferation and medial calcification are responsible for arterial stiffness in CKD. VSMC proliferation also causes intimal hyperplasia and arterial stenotic lesions, which contribute to the development of atherosclerosis. In a study evaluating the effect of indoxyl sulfate on VSMC proliferation, Yamamoto et al described that indoxyl sulfate directly stimulates rat VSMC proliferation and activates mitogen‐activated protein kinase in vitro.30 Using human aortic smooth muscle cells (HASMCs), Muteliefu et al reported that indoxyl sulfate significantly promotes the proliferation of HASMCs, in a concentration‐dependent manner, by inducing oxidative stress.31 Additionally, Adijiang et al demonstrated in vivo that indoxyl sulfate promotes aortic calcification and aortic wall thickening in hypertensive rats.32 Muteliefu et al further demonstrated in vitro that indoxyl sulfate induces free radicals, such as superoxide, by upregulating NADPH oxidase, especially NADPH oxidase 4 (Nox4).33 Free radicals derived from Nox4 are important for the induction of transdifferentiation of HASMCs into cells with a more‐osteoblastic phenotype.

Congestive Heart Failure

Epidemiological studies show that sudden cardiac death, arrhythmia, or congestive heart failure are more‐prominent causes of cardiovascular death than coronary artery disease in patients with ESRD.47 This finding suggests that the mechanistic processes driving CVD in CKD may differ from those in the general population. “Uremic cardiomyopathy” is pathologically composed of interstitial fibrosis, microvessel disease with a selective capillary deficit, and wall thickening of intramyocardial arterioles in the hypertrophied heart.48 By using isolated neonatal rat cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts as well as a human leukemia monocytic cell line, Lekawanvijit et al demonstrated in vitro that indoxyl sulfate has proinflammatory, profibrotic, and prohypertrophic effects, indicating that indoxyl sulfate might adversely contribute to cardiac remodeling in CKD.34 Furthermore, reduction of indoxyl sulfate with AST‐120, an oral charcoal adsorbent, was accompanied by reduced left ventricular fibrosis and transforming growth factor (TGF)‐β and phosphorylated nuclear factor kappa B (NF‐κB) protein expression in subtotal‐nephrectomized rats in a blood‐pressure–independent manner.35 Fujii et al also showed that administration of AST‐120 leads to reduction of oxidative stress, cardiac fibrosis, and left ventricular hypertrophy in a subtotal nephrectomy rat model.36 Taken together, the cardiac profibrotic effect of indoxyl sulfate is likely to be driven by the oxidative stress/NF‐κB/TGF‐β pathway through NADPH oxidases.

Arrhythmia

Sudden cardiac death is the leading cause of death in dialysis patients, accounting for 20% to 30% of all deaths in this population.47 Although a proportion of sudden cardiac death events could be caused by acute coronary ischemia, the overall incidence of sudden cardiac death is much greater than the incidence of coronary events,49 probably suggesting a primary increase in the risk of fatal ventricular arrhythmias in patients with ESRD.50 Several factors, including uremia‐specific factors that arise from retained uremic toxins, could predispose patients with CKD to a higher risk of ventricular arrhythmias. In a recent study, Tang et al showed, in a cohort of early CKD patients, that serum indoxyl sulfate level was independently associated with prolonged QTc interval. In vitro, the arrhythmogenic effect of indoxyl sulfate was shown through inhibition of the H9c2 cardiomyocyte Ik channel.37 As CKD progresses, the proarrhythmic effect of indoxyl sulfate may be enhanced in conjunction with a sustained increase in sympathetic tone,51 left ventricular hypertrophy,52 and fluid and electrolyte imbalance.53 Therefore, the observations by Tang et al are interesting and warrant further investigation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common clinical arrhythmia, causes significant cardiovascular morbidity and mortality attributed to congestive heart failure and stroke. Reported estimates of the prevalence of AF in nondialysis CKD patients range from 8% to 18%, compared to 0.4% to 1.0% in the general population.54 Using data from a large, population‐based study, Alonso et al reported that impaired kidney function and presence of albuminuria were strongly associated with the incidence of AF independently of other cardiovascular risk factors.55 CKD may increase the risk of AF because of poor blood pressure control and expansion of extracellular fluid,56 leading to left ventricular hypertrophy and, eventually, atrial stretch and fibrosis. In addition, an upregulated renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system in CKD causes fibrosis and electric remodeling in the atrium,57 providing a substrate for the development of AF. Finally, the cardiac profibrotic effect of indoxyl sulfate may alter atrial electrical conduction and excitability. Indoxyl sulfate has been proven to induce arrhythmogenesis through oxidative stress in pulmonary veins, sinoatrial nodes, and left atria isolated from rabbit hearts.38 Recently, Aoki et al showed, in 5 of 6 nephrectomized rats, that indoxyl sulfate contributes to the increased inducibility of AF, which is significantly attenuated by AST‐120 treatment.39 Therefore, strategies for the prevention of AF will have to consider indoxyl sulfate as a novel risk factor for AF, in addition to other well‐established risk factors in CKD.

Vascular Access Thrombosis

Vascular access dysfunction continues to be a major source of morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis patients. Thrombosis is the most common cause of AVG dysfunction. Although thrombosis may develop secondary to intimal hyperplasia at the venous anastomosis, it can also develop in the absence of any demonstrable structural abnormalities. However, few data are available on the mechanisms involved in the later event. Indoxyl‐sulfate–induced hypercoagulability may play a role in the pathogenesis of the prothrombotic state. The results of our recent study have demonstrated that serum indoxyl sulfate is an independent predictor for dialysis AVG thrombosis after endovascular interventions.8 Accumulating evidence has shown that indoxyl sulfate increases endothelial cell and VSMC productions of tissue factor (TF).40, 41 TF is a crucial mediator of injury‐related thrombosis. Using a model of the de‐endothelialized, postinterventional state, Chitalia et al exposed human VSMCs (pretreated with uremic serum obtained from ESRD patients on hemodialysis) to coronary‐like blood flow.40 They found that uremic serum significantly upregulates VSMC TF levels and is profoundly thrombogenic. Recently, Gondouin et al have also demonstrated that both circulating TF concentration and activity were elevated and were positively correlated with plasma indoxyl sulfate in patients with CKD.41 These findings suggest that indoxyl sulfate should be considered as a biomarker or risk factor for postinterventional vascular access thrombosis in patients with ESRD on hemodialysis.58

Peripheral Arterial Disease

Patients with CKD have an increased prevalence of PAD.59 Unfortunately, PAD in CKD is a challenging problem because it is associated with an increased risk of mortality and morbidity, including limb amputation.60 Moreover, outcomes of revascularization for critical limb ischemia in patients with CKD are poor.61 Risk factors for PAD among patients with CKD are not fully understood, but probably include both conventional and uremia‐associated risk factors. Jacob et al have shown, in a rat model of subtotal nephrectomy and hindlimb ischemia (HI), that CKD impairs angiogenesis and limb perfusion.62 Angiogenesis, defined as the sprouting of new blood vessels from preexisting vascular structures, is an essential physiological process for tissue ischemia. Indoxyl sulfate has been shown to inhibit endothelial proliferation and wound repair by increasing free radical production.27 Neovascularization involves not only the proliferation of local endothelial cells, but also circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) derived from bone marrow. In an ischemic microenvironment, ischemia‐induced hypoxia‐inducible factor (HIF)‐1α, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and NO are known to be essential for EPC mobilization, homing, and angiogenesis.63, 64

Indoxyl sulfate has been shown to have direct effects on EPCs through NO‐dependent mechanisms both in vitro and in vivo.65 In a recent study, we aimed to elucidate whether indoxyl sulfate could impede neovascularization in ischemic hindlimbs through modulating EPC function in CKD.42 Subtotal nephrectomy was undertaken in 8‐week‐old male C57BL/6 mice, which were then divided into 3 groups including the vehicle group, the indole group, and the indole plus AST‐120 group. Eight weeks later, unilateral HI surgery was introduced in all animals. At week 2 and week 4 after HI surgery, blood flow recovery, as detected by laser Doppler, was significantly impeded in the indole group compared to the vehicle group, but was improved in the indole plus AST‐120 group (Figure 2). In parallel, circulatory Sca1/Flk‐1‐positive EPCs and the density of CD31+ capillary neovessels in muscle of ischemic limbs after HI surgery were significantly reduced in the indole group compared to those in the vehicle group. Similarly, the reductions were significantly reversed in the indole plus AST‐120 group.

Figure 2.

Effects of indoxyl sulfate on ischemia‐induced neovascularization in SNx mice. SNx mice were divided into 3 groups: the vehicle group, the indole group, and the indole+AST‐120 group. Blood perfusion in ischemic hindlimb was measured immediately after, and 2 and 4 weeks after, HI surgery by laser Doppler. Results are means±SEM. *P<0.05 versus vehicle group; #P<0.05 versus indole group; n=5 in each group. HI indicates hindlimb ischemia; SNx, subtotal nephrectomy.

In the same study, we first showed in vitro and in vivo that indoxyl sulfate suppresses EPC angiogenic function by inhibiting hypoxia‐induced HIF‐1α activation and consecutive interleukin (IL)‐10 and VEGF synthesis.42 The toxic effects of a variety of environmental contaminants, such as dioxins, are mediated by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), for which indoxyl sulfate is an endogenous ligand. AhR requires aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT) to regulate gene expression. ARNT, also called HIF‐1β, is also required by HIF‐1α to enhance the expression of various genes in response to hypoxia. Therefore, AhR activation by indoxyl sulfate suppresses accumulation of the HIF‐1α‐ARNT complex in the nucleus in inverse proportion to the increase in amount of the nuclear AhR‐ARNT complex, resulting in inhibition of HIF‐1α activity.43 Recent evidence suggests that the adverse cardiovascular effects of indoxyl sulfate could be mediated by AhR activation, in a “dioxin‐like” effect.66 Together, by inducing endothelial dysfunction and TF expression, indoxyl sulfate favors atherosclerosis and thrombosis, which, in turn, results in limb ischemia. In the presence of tissue hypoxia, however, indoxyl sulfate further decreases the proangiogenic functions of EPCs by suppressing the HIF‐1α/IL‐10/VEGF pathway, leading to impaired neovascularization and thus progression of PAD. Our results strongly support the concept that therapies targeting indoxyl sulfate could be an alternative approach for PAD in patients with CKD.

Approaches to Decrease Gut‐Derived Uremic Toxin Production

Given that the gut microbiota generates an important portion of uremic toxins, modification of gut microenvironment and microbial composition represents a promising therapeutic target to decrease the generation of uremic toxins and their adverse cardiovascular effects. Interventions aimed at preventing gut‐derived uremic toxin production and absorption can be divided into 3 main approaches: dietary protein restriction, maintenance of gut symbiosis, and oral sorbents.67 Encouraging results, in terms of decreased indoxyl sulfate levels and cardiovascular protective effects, have been shown in several clinical studies in patients with CKD (Table 3).68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78 Additional adequately powered randomized, controlled trials are required to determine whether indoxyl‐sulfate–lowering therapy reduces the risk of CVD in CKD.79, 80

Table 3.Indoxyl Sulfate Lowering and Cardiovascular Effects in Studies Targeting on Gut‐Derived Uremic Toxins in Patients With CKD

Conclusions

Patients with CKD are strongly predisposed to the development CVD. Evidence is emerging that besides the traditional risk factors, uremia‐specific risk factors that arise from the accumulation of gut‐derived uremic toxins, such as indoxyl sulfate, may be directly responsible for the pathogenesis of CVD in CKD. These pathophysiological effects explain the association between indoxyl sulfate concentration and the increased risk of CVD and mortality in patients with CKD. Therefore, strategies designed to reduce the serum levels of indoxyl sulfate may be considered as a novel therapeutic approach in improving the outcomes of CVD associated with CKD.

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Novel Bioengineering and Technological Approaches to Solve Two Major Health Problems in Taiwan sponsored by the Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology Academic Excellence Program (MOST 105‐2633‐B‐009‐003) and Research Project (MOST 103‐2314‐B‐005‐MY2 and MOST 105‐2314‐B‐014‐MY3), the Ministry of Science and Technology, ROC; Foundation for Poison Control; and Research Project (TCRD‐TPE‐103‐RT‐4 and TCRD‐TPE‐104‐RT‐4), Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Taiwan.

References

Citation data is made available by participants in Crossref's Cited-by Linking service. For a more comprehensive list of citations to this article, users are encouraged to perform a search inSciFinder.

  • The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor: A Key Bridging Molecule of External and Internal Chemical Signals

    JijingTianYuFengHualingFuHeidi QunhuiXieJoy XiaosongJiangBinZhao

    Environmental Science & Technology201549 (16), 9518-9531

    Abstract | Full Text HTML | PDF | PDF w/ Links

  • Naturally Occurring Marine Brominated Indoles Are Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Ligands/Agonists

    Danica E.DeGrootDiana G.FranksTatsuoHigaJunichiTanakaMark E.HahnMichael S.Denison

    Chemical Research in Toxicology201528 (6), 1176-1185

    Abstract | Full Text HTML | PDF | PDF w/ Links

  • Scaffold-free generation of uniform adipose spheroids for metabolism research and drug discovery

    Aloysius J.KlingelhutzFrancoise A.GourroncAnnaChalyDavid A.WadkinsAnthony J.BurandKathleen R.MarkanSharon O.IdigaMengWuMatthew J.PotthoffJames A.Ankrum

    Scientific Reports20188 (1),

  • Impact of the Oral Adsorbent AST-120 on Organ-Specific Accumulation of Uremic Toxins: LC-MS/MS and MS Imaging Techniques

    EmikoSatoDaisukeSaigusaEikanMishimaTaekoUchidaDaisukeMiuraTomomiMorikawa-IchinoseKiyomiKisuAkiyoSekimotoRitsumiSaitoYujiOeYotaroMatsumotoYoshihisaTomiokaTakefumiMoriNobuyukiTakahashiHiroshiSatoTakaakiAbeToshimitsuNiwaSadayoshiIto

    Toxins201810 (2), 19

  • Aryl hydrocarbon receptor is activated in patients and mice with chronic kidney disease

    LaetitiaDouStéphanePoitevinMarionSalléeTawfikAddiBertrandGondouinNathalieMcKayMichael S.DenisonNoémieJourde-ChicheArianeDuval-SabatierClaireCeriniPhilippeBrunetFrançoiseDignat-GeorgeStéphaneBurtey

    Kidney International2018,

  • Microbiota-derived uremic retention solutes: perpetrators of altered nonrenal drug clearance in kidney disease

    Alexander JProkopienkoThomas DNolin

    Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology201811 (1), 71-82

  • Regulation of the Immune Response by the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor

    CristinaGutiérrez-VázquezFrancisco J.Quintana

    Immunity201848 (1), 19-33

  • Indoxyl sulfate (IS)-mediated immune dysfunction provokes endothelial damage in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD)

    Hee YoungKimTae-HyunYooYuriHwangGa HyeLeeBonahKimJiyeonJangHee TaeYu

  • Comments

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *